|
I
saw the works of Larry Elmore for the first time when a group of
completely young artists visited me and drew my
|
|
attention
to him. At first, I thought that those children did not know
anything about art. But, being a curious man, I looked for his
work and realized that those “children” were right.
|
|
It
was a really great artist who easily gets into our souls and
captures them by the power of his talent and the authenticity of
his expression.
|
|
Elmore
discovers the world of fairies, fiction, magic, connecting it with
the miracle of human existence by the preciseness of a classicist
and by imagination of a post-modernist and a great artist.
|
|
You
will find Elmore’s soul mates more easily in literature than in
the art of painting and obvious examples are Umberto Ecco and
Tolkin. Of course, when I say “soul mates”, I do not think
that Elmore follows the paths defined by the two writers. What I
am talking about is the inner vocation and the power of expression.
|
|
His
paintings have the story, mythos, the soul of tragedy according to
Aristotle, painted through parabolas, allegories and, very often,
metaphors. The painter is willfully, powerfully and utterly
inspired by it. While doing this, he takes us into the “ altered
state of consciousness”, the state of purgatory or even better,
the state of the very art itself.
|
|
What
is especially fascinating about Elmore is his highly consistent
denial of any kind of didactics, any kind of “usability” or
“usefulness” of a work of art. With him, his work is devoid of
function, almost in a Parnassian way, but not cold, thus being
brought to art as a state. I would say that it is all about
extraordinary courage and challenge, about the way art is taken
only by the chosen ones.
|
|
©
Nikola Kitanovic, 2002 |
|